sherrydramsey: (Greenkeyboard)
2011-04-04 09:13 pm

Famous Authors and Their Typewriters

Earlier today I browsed through this photo collection of famous authors and their typewriters. If you haven’t seen it, take a moment to do so. Go ahead, I’ll wait until you get back.

straightens up desk for a few moments

Oh, you’re back? Cool photos, aren’t they? But you know what struck me most about them, apart from their coolness? The almost total lack of clutter around these authors as they wrote.

Yes, there were a few exceptions, but if you go back you’ll notice that these were, of the bunch, more recent photos. In most of them, it was just the author, the typewriter, and one or two other items like paper, a book or two, or maybe an ashtray.

Now, yes, it’s entirely possible that in the brief time before the photo was taken, there was a mad rush of tidying, of sweeping half-empty gin bottles and wineglasses out of sight, of doctoring up the scene to look more professional and “author-ish.” But still, as I look around my desk, I notice all the things that would not have to be tidied away: computer mouse, gadget dock, portable phone, USB drives, CDs, lists of website references, etc. I have approximately 30 pens on my desk, a stack of sticky notes (used and blank), notepads, file folders, timesheets, a mug warmer, and a handful of writing “totems.” In the computer background I’m running Twitter, a browser with a research or dictionary site, and an IM/chat client. Maybe I’m just messier and more cluttered than most people–but somehow I don’t think so.

Not that I want to trade my computer and go back to using a typewriter. Been there, done that, no thanks. Not that I want my writing space to be necessarily as sterile and empty as that in many of the photos. But still–is there something to be said for fewer distractions, fewer projects, fewer deadlines? Would less visual clutter lead to less mental clutter, and a clearer vision of the work in progress?

It’s ironic that many writers probably have made something of a return to the days pictured in this photo collection, as their workspace becomes whatever spot they plunk down their laptop, tablet, or gadget-of-the-week. However, in this connected world, I think it’s probably a rare moment when it’s really stripped down to the writer, the device, and the words. I wonder which group, the ones in the photos, or those of us working today, are really working smarter?

sherrydramsey: (Greenkeyboard)
2010-07-15 03:11 pm
Entry tags:

I Write Like...

I saw some Facebook friends referencing this lately, so of course I had to try it: http://iwl.me/

Basically, you plug in an excerpt of your writing, it's analyzed, and you get a result comparing your writing to that of a famous author.  Sounds like fun!

So I plugged in the first excerpt (the instructions were to use at least a few paragraphs, so I went one better and pasted in about ten pages).  The result?  I write like...Dan Brown!

Hmmmm.

Okay, so I don't think he's the worst writer ever, and he has certainly made his writing work for him, from a fame and fortune point of view.  Not such a bad thing.  But...but...really?

So I chose another story (you can see where this is going, can't you?) and plugged in ten pages of that.  This time I was channeling David Foster Wallace, whom I am sorry to say I had to look up on Wikipedia.  Okay, "one of the most influential and innovative writers of the last 20 years" is pretty cool, but he wrote postmodern literature and hysterical realism (which I also had to look up) and ultimately committed suicide?  Doesn't really sound like me...

The next six attempts had me writing like H.P Lovecraft, Kurt Vonnegut, William Gibson, and Mark Twain, and a repeat each of Brown and Wallace. Now I was addicted.  Another excerpt.  Chuck Palahniuk.  My two YA novel excerpts got Wallace again, then James Joyce.

James Joyce?

Okay, at this point I was trying to decide what it all meant.  I didn't keep trying in order to get a writer I liked--I mean, I already had some great genre writers in the list.  Did it mean that the program is just wonky, or that I have my own unique style, which I alter slightly to fit the piece I'm writing?  I liked that idea.  But still...one more time.



Oh, yeah.  I'll take it. :)